Please support Web standards. Have a look at this page on the Web Standards Project site.
Kaiser, R.B., & Craig, S.B. (2005). Building a better mousetrap: Item characteristics associated with rating discrepancies in 360-degree feedback. Consulting Psychology Journal: Research and Practice, 57, 235-245.
The authors investigated whether the low level of convergence commonly found in assessments made by multiple raters of the same target manager is partly a function of the linguistic properties of the rating items. They found a relationship between how items are written and the inter-rater reliability of peer and subordinate evaluations. Their results suggest that the clarity and consistency of 360-degree feedback can be enhanced by ensuring that items are behaviorally specific, put in context, and narrowly focused.
Article in copyrighted peer-review journal: Reprints available by request.
Filed under: Journal & Magazine Articles